I proposed a new way of thinking about artificial    intelligence

When you really define what we’re doing, we’re using a computer to complete comparative analysis , and draw conclusions, at the speed of light . Thereby in conclusion, what we percieve.. and the conclusions only somewhat mathematically based. They may teflect the subjectiveness of developer who coded the model. The conclusion is non-biased and reflects the bias of the developer I am just trying to understand the facts no the interpretation ,

While, I realize many may already know this, it is paradigm shifting for me

So the bottom line is that what you’re reading or is the opinion of a human in the end which may be subjective and no science fact